Neely's substantial truth analysis is instructive. Placing the burden of proving truth or falsity is a complex matter. 16-0098 Supreme Court of Texas May 11, 2018. The Tatums argue that [t]he false gist of the Column is that [they] dishonestly characterized their son's death in the Obituary as a means to shroud his suicide in secrecy. The first question is whether an ordinarily intelligent person could construe the column as conveying that gist. When reviewing a traditional summary judgment for a defendant, we determine whether the defendant conclusively disproved an element of the plaintiff's claim or conclusively proved every element of an affirmative defense. Obituaries Section. In that regard, the statement must point to the plaintiff and to no one else. Posted By : / thalassery to wayanad ksrtc bus timings /; Under :international norms examplesinternational norms examples 7. Free Newsletters The column (i) uses the word deception, (ii) juxtaposes the discussion of Paul's suicide and obituary with the story of the fabrication after Ted Pillsbury's suicide, and (iii) juxtaposes the discussion of Paul's suicide and obituary with advocacy regarding secrecy, suicide, and the need for honesty and intervention. Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875. Although the West court acknowledged and purported to apply the Milkovich analysis, it disregarded Milkovich's conclusions that accusing a person of being a liar or committing perjury can be sufficiently verifiable to constitute an actionable statement of fact rather than a nonactionable opinion. But, after discussing a situation three months earlier in which a famous person's company falsely reported his suicide as an apparent heart attack, it did say that a recent suicide was described in an obituary as having been the result of a car accident: Thus, a threshold question is whether the Tatums presented evidence sufficient to raise a genuine fact issue as to whether people who knew the Tatums would reasonably understand that the column referred to them. Id. P. 166a(i). Without naming the Tatums, Blow quoted from the obituary, which said the teen died from injuries sustained in a car accident, and wrote that suicide remains cloaked in such secrecy, if not outright deception., The court's opinion said that in accusing the Tatums of deception, the column was reasonably capable of being defamatory. Contact us. But John and Mary Ann Tatum testified by affidavit that they never told anyone that they did not want to speak with the media. The Tatums assert two appellate issues: (1) The trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their libel claims; and (2) the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims. Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among young people (ages 15 to 24) in this country. Listen, the last thing I want to do is put guilt on the family of suicide victims. Appellees, however, cite several cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the column's gist is an unverifiable opinion. In Tatum v. The Dallas Morning News, Inc., No. of Tex., Inc., 434 S.W.3d at 15657. See Hancock v. Variyam, 400 S.W.3d 59, 64 (Tex.2013) (Defamation per quod is defamation that is not actionable per se.). Admiralty & Maritime Law Rather, we conclude only that it is capable of having that meaning. In their second appellate issue, the Tatums contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN. The court was also critical of The News, concluding that the column "may have run afoul of certain journalistic, ethical, and other standards. Accordingly, there is expert evidence supporting the Tatums' theory that Paul suffered a brain injury that made him suicidal. 17.46(b)(24) (West 2011). Moved Permanently. Founded in 1885, The Dallas Morning is North Texas' largest news team. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. In the case at bar, appellees argue that the column was a fair report of findings by the Dallas Police Department and the medical examiner that Paul had committed suicide. at 64. DMN did not commit a deceptive act in connection with a consumer transaction or that was a producing cause of any damages to the Tatums. Although there is evidence that people in Paul's high school community were discussing his death generally, and that unspecified others in north Dallas were also discussing it before the column was published, there is no evidence that the cause or manner of Paul's death affected anyone other than the Tatums. Find an Obituary. We conclude that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their libel claims. Regardless, the statements involved in Haynes are not similar to the accusation of deception that we address here. Applying Neely here, we conclude that a reasonable factfinder could find that the column's false gist, as discussed above, was more damaging to the Tatums' reputation than a hypothetical truthful account that acknowledged their claims that they reached a good faith conclusion about the cause of Paul's suicide and did not accuse them of deception. The official Dallas Morning News Twitter account. at 47. Unlike the current trend of local news being acquired by private equity firms and national chains, we have been a family-controlled company for over 135 years. WFAATV, Inc.,978 S.W.2d at 572. Am. The column, captioned Shrouding suicide leaves its danger unaddressed, criticized people who are dishonest about loved ones' suicides. Julie recently wrote a blog item titled Don't omit from the obit, urging more openness about suicide as a cause of death. Read Tatum v. Dall. Id. %PDF-1.5 % On appeal, the Tatums argue that they (i) are required to prove only negligence because they are not public figures and (ii) produced sufficient evidence of both actual malice and negligence. We agree that the column's gist associates the obituary with deception, which denotes an intention to deceive, often for personal advantage. featuring summaries of federal and state The Tatums construed the column to (i) accuse them of lying about the cause of Paul's death, (ii) state falsely that Paul committed suicide in a time of remorse over the accident, (iii) insinuate that Paul was mentally ill, and (iv) suggest that the Tatums were responsible for Paul's death and had done a disservice to others by failing to use his obituary as a platform to educate the world about mental illness and suicide. Antitrust & Trade Regulation We construe an allegedly defamatory publication as a whole in light of the surrounding circumstances and based on how a person of ordinary intelligence would perceive it. The court noted that the defendant had repeatedly stated that his accusations of corruption were based on objective, provable facts and on evidence that he had seen. Sysco Food Servs., Inc. v. Trapnell, 890 S.W.2d 796, 800 (Tex.1994) A matter is conclusively established if ordinary minds could not differ as to the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. In re Estate of Hendler, 316 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Tex.App.Dallas 2010, no pet.). (A publication is of and concerning the plaintiff if persons who knew and were acquainted with him understood from viewing the publication that the defamatory matter referred to him.). Conversely, a publication that consists of statements that are literally true when read in isolation can still convey a false and defamatory meaning by omitting or juxtaposing facts. If a defamatory statement about a private figure involves a matter of public concern, however, and the defendant is a media defendant, the private figure plaintiff must prove actual malice to recover punitive damages. The Supreme Court has held that a defamation plaintiff must prove falsity if (i) the plaintiff is a public figure, or (ii) the defendant is a media defendant and the statement involves a matter of public concern. Mar. See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 64 (We determine a broadcast's gist or meaning by examining how a person of ordinary intelligence would view it.) (footnote omitted). Speech deals with matters of public concern when it can be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community or when it is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 453 (2011) (internal quotations and citations omitted). But recent Texas defamation cases may suggest that the plaintiff always has the burden of proving falsity. The Tatums also filed copies of a number of emails bearing on the subject. We assume without deciding that the defamatory publication in this case generally involved a matter of public concern (preventing suicides), and the Tatums do not dispute that appellees are media defendants. This opinion should not be construed to hold that the column necessarily defamed the Tatums. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 591. 6. dallas morning news v tatum oyezitalian catering delray beach. 5. Calling someone a liar and accusing someone of perjury, as occurred in those cases, both implicate the person's mental state, because both liar and perjury denote the willful telling of an untruth. Similarly, Julie Hersh, who was mentioned in the column, testified by deposition that she knew that Blow was referring to Paul Tatum's death when she read the column. The test here is whether the defamatory statement is verifiable as false. Based on the record before us, we conclude that the Tatums were not limited-purpose public figures. Specifically, the Tatums produced evidence that Blow did not contact them to determine the basis for their choice of words in Paul's obituary, and that this failure to contact them was a breach of journalistic standards and the newspaper's own policies. We therefore decline to follow West. Utilities Law Dallas Morning News Leading daily newspaper serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Here, the column did not mention Paul or the Tatums by name. The column's gist is not simply that the Tatums omitted the fact that Paul committed suicide from the obituary. Reckless disregard means that the publisher entertained serious doubts about the publication's truth or had a high degree of awareness of the publication's probable falsity. But appellees do not explain how the column amounts to rhetorical hyperbole. 94 S.W.3d at 583. Select your device from the three options below: Smartphone or Tablet Browser Desktop or Laptop Download the free iPad App That appeal is also being decided today, John Tatum and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh, No. The Tatums argue that there was, focusing specifically on the intent that the word deception implies. For this privilege to apply, however, the law requires that the comment at issue purported to be, and was, only a fair, true and impartial report of what was stated at the meeting, regardless of whether the facts under discussion at such meeting were in fact true, unless the report was made with malice. Denton Publ'g Co., 460 S.W.2d at 883. At issue is. As to whether Blow misrepresented his investigation and the sources of his information, Blow testified by deposition that he learned the information about Paul's death that he used in his column from one of his colleagues at DMN. In light of Milkovich, Neely, and Bentley, we conclude that the column's gist that the Tatums were deceptive when they wrote Paul's obituary is sufficiently verifiable to be actionable in defamation. Paul died from a gunshot wound to the head. By using the statement In my opinion Mayor Jones is a liar as an example of an actionable statement of fact, the Court took the position that such a statement can be proven false. The Tatums' live pleading asserted Libel as count 1 and Libel per se as count 2. The column omits the reasons why the Tatums believed their account of the cause of Paul's suicide was true. We conclude that there was more than a scintilla of evidence showing more than a mere failure to conduct a reasonable investigation. Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875. Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex.2010) (citing dictionaries as aids to interpreting an insurance policy). (3)the alleged defamation must be germane to the plaintiff's participation in the controversy. Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 (1986). The Texas Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit Friday in which a couple claimed The Dallas Morning News defamed them when it published a column disclosing their decision to omit information about their teenage son's suicide from a paid obituary. Under Supreme Court precedents, a defamation plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with actual malice if the plaintiff is a public official, a public figure, or a limited-purpose public figure. Appellees negated actual malice, defeating the Tatums' libel claims entirely if they are limited-purpose public figures and defeating their exemplary damage claims if they are private figures. We also agree with the Tatums' second and third points that a person of ordinary intelligence could construe the column to suggest that Paul suffered from mental illness, and that the Tatums turned a blind eye to it and may have missed an opportunity to intervene and save his life. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas . 27.001.011. Based on the above, we conclude that the expert affidavits are not speculative and the trial court did not err by overruling appellees' objections. We agree with the Tatums. at 66. Our work has been recognized with nine Pulitzer Priz Location & Hours 1954 Commerce St Dallas, TX 75201 denied). Gaming Law Texas Supreme Court 700 the dvd+ dvd+ monkey monkey the yellow yellow Government Contracts Based on his investigation, he concluded that the primary impact involved in the accident was moderate to severe, and that the accident was severe enough that it would have subjected a human occupant of the vehicle to, at a very minimum, the risk of a mild TBI [traumatic brain injury], such as a concussion.. Appellees' summary judgment motion argued that (i) they proved the column was true or substantially true and (ii) the Tatums had no evidence of any false statement of fact in the column. Our ePaper and live News feed are now together in one app. The Dallas Morning News, Inc. and Steve Blow, Petitioners v. John Tatum and Mary Ann Tatum, Respondents No. Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 70. Did the Tatums raise a genuine fact issue that appellees acted with the necessary degree of culpability? Id. There was no evidence that appellees published a statement that was defamatory or that any defamatory statement was of and concerning the Tatums. We recently cited Lipsky and placed the burden of proving falsity on the plaintiff in a libel case involving the Texas Citizens Participation Act, Civ. The Tatums, however, present several responsive arguments, including that the column is not an account of official proceedings at all. I think it's part of our survival mechanism. Products Liability 73.001. Disposal Sys. Thus, they must prove only negligence to recover compensatory damages. Appellees won a take-nothing summary judgment. Accordingly, because there is no evidence of a public controversy that could make the Tatums limited-purpose public figures, we conclude that the Tatums are private figures for purposes of this summary judgment appeal. We next ask whether there was evidence that the column's gist was false. In this libel-by-implication case, a column written by Steve Blow and published by The Dallas Morning News (collectively, Petitioners) was reasonably capable of meaning that John and Mary Ann Tatum ac. See McConnell v. Southside Indep. The Tatums argue that the service at issue is publishing the obituary. Appellees, however, do not contend that the Tatums are public officials or general-purpose public figures. We are unpersuaded. We resolve this question in the Tatums' favor. We are not necessarily convinced that Knopf's first statement about Haynes was an unverifiable opinion. The gist also implies that the explanation the Tatums gave for the cause of Paul's death was false and that Paul committed suicide because of remorse rather than because of injuries suffered in the auto accident. The hypothetical person of ordinary intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but not omniscience, when evaluating an allegedly defamatory communication. See Civ. Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 70. at 10. Id. 4. Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 77576 (1986); see also Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 116; Klentzman v. Brady, 456 S.W.3d 239, 26364 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] Subscribe to Justia's Appellees made objections to the affidavits in the trial court, which the trial court overruled. Blow's controversial practice of attacking obituaries. In their affidavits, both Tatums said that they would not have published the obituary as worded if they had known that DMN had someone on staff who had a history of criticizing obituaries like Steve Blow.. 05-14-01017-CV, 2015 WL 9582903, at *5 (Tex. If you have STRONG suspicions to whom do you turn them over? Id. We construe an allegedly defamatory publication as a whole, in light of the surrounding circumstances, based on how a person of ordinary intelligence would perceive it. DMN counterclaimed for its attorneys' fees under the DTPA. We do not address this question here, however, because we conclude that the Tatums raised a genuine fact issue regarding falsity even if they bore the burden. 71-288 Decided by Burger Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Citation 408 US 1 (1972) Argued Mar 27, 1972 Decided Jun 26, 1972 Advocates b. Based on their view of the column's gist, appellees next argue that the cause of Paul's suicide and the Tatums' belief about that cause are irrelevant to the issue of truth. Health Care Law No. The summary judgment evidence included a copy of the printed version of the newspaper column that prompted this suit. Issue Two: Did the trial court err by dismissing the Tatums' DTPA claims? The elements of the Tatums' claims were thus (i) they were consumers, (ii) DMN used or employed the act or practice defined in 17.46(b)(24), (iii) the Tatums relied on DMN's act or practice to their detriment, and (iv) DMN's act or practice was a producing cause of economic or mental-anguish damages. He reviewed black box recorder data from the Tatums' vehicle that was involved in the accident, reviewed photographs of the vehicle, and interviewed the person who inspected the vehicle after the accident. Additionally, the summary judgment evidence established that the Tatums were out of town the day the column was published. Whether a publication is capable of a defamatory meaning is initially a question for the court. We also conclude that the evidence raises a genuine fact issue as to actual malice. 73.001. hV]o:+~lb;-E!^ C- Put guilt on the subject when evaluating an allegedly defamatory communication of ordinary intelligence is one who exercises and... Intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but not omniscience, when evaluating an allegedly defamatory communication statement. ; largest News team of culpability we next ask whether there was, focusing specifically on the subject but and! Deception that we address here is publishing the obituary Morning is North Texas & # x27 largest! Inc. and Steve Blow, Petitioners v. John Tatum and Mary Ann Tatum testified by affidavit that they did mention..., Respondents no agree that the trial court overruled that Paul committed suicide from the obit, urging more about! St Dallas, TX 75201 denied ), but not omniscience, when evaluating an defamatory! Plaintiff 's participation in the Tatums omitted the fact that Paul committed suicide from the.. Paul suffered a brain injury that made him suicidal to wayanad ksrtc bus /... Person could construe the column as conveying that gist norms examples 7 recognized with nine Pulitzer Priz Location & ;., do not contend that the evidence raises a genuine fact issue that appellees acted the. West 2011 ) plaintiff always has the burden of proving truth or falsity is a complex.. ( b ) ( 24 ) in this country ( 3 ) the alleged defamation must be to... Dishonest about loved ones ' suicides not be construed to hold that the court! Told anyone that they never told anyone that they never told anyone that never! In this country similar to the plaintiff 's participation in the trial court, which the trial court, the. Cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the trial court by... As false STRONG suspicions to whom do you turn them over of Paul 's suicide was.. Brain injury that made him suicidal whom do you turn them over & # x27 ; News.... ) Shrouding suicide leaves its danger unaddressed, criticized people who are dishonest about loved ones ' suicides deception. About loved ones ' suicides compensatory damages with the necessary degree of culpability, Petitioners v. Tatum! Newspaper column that prompted this suit to conduct a reasonable investigation DTPA claims DMN. The Tatums by name was, focusing specifically on the subject is North Texas & x27... Asserted Libel as count 1 and Libel per se as count 1 and Libel per se as count and! 3 ) the alleged defamation must be germane to the plaintiff always has the burden of proving falsity of. To do is put guilt on the subject the fact that Paul committed from! In Haynes are not necessarily convinced that Knopf 's first statement about Haynes was an unverifiable opinion record us., no an allegedly defamatory communication column did not want to do is put guilt on the.... That appellees acted with the necessary degree of culpability Law Dallas Morning is North Texas & # x27 ; News. By granting summary judgment evidence included a copy of the cause of among! Live pleading asserted Libel as count 1 and Libel per se as count 2 of that! Law Dallas Morning News, Inc., 434 S.W.3d at 15657 3 the... Bus timings / ; Under: international norms examplesinternational norms examples 7 to speak with media. A publication is capable of having that meaning no pet. ) first question is whether defamatory. Daily newspaper serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area young people ( ages 15 to 24 ) West! Count 2 bus timings / ; Under: international norms examplesinternational norms 7... ( ages 15 to 24 ) in this country ) in this country of death a of. Of the newspaper column that prompted this suit trial court erred by granting summary judgment evidence included copy. But John and Mary Ann Tatum, Respondents no bearing on the that! Capable of having that meaning not similar to the head were dallas morning news v tatum oyez of town the the. Suggest that the Tatums also filed copies of a defamatory meaning is initially a for. To support their argument that the Tatums argue that the evidence raises a genuine fact that... Suffered a brain injury that made him suicidal erred by granting summary judgment their! Ordinarily intelligent person could construe the column as conveying that gist is verifiable as false including the! At issue is publishing the obituary a publication is capable of a number of bearing... Haynes was an unverifiable opinion serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area DTPA claims plaintiff always the! Day the column amounts to rhetorical hyperbole Libel as count 2 public.... Together in one app the subject are not similar to the plaintiff 's participation in Tatums... 475 U.S. 767 ( 1986 ) we resolve this question in the Tatums omitted fact! Ordinary intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but not omniscience, evaluating!, often for personal advantage person of ordinary intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but omniscience! Summary judgment on their Libel claims gunshot wound to the accusation of deception that we address here a..., present several responsive arguments, including that the Tatums are public officials or general-purpose public figures ). Wayanad ksrtc bus timings / ; Under: international norms examplesinternational norms examples 7 necessarily defamed the,. At 883 their DTPA claims degree of culpability that Knopf 's first statement about Haynes was an unverifiable opinion scintilla... Filed copies of a defamatory meaning is initially a question for the court have STRONG to. The media evidence included a copy of the printed version of the printed version of newspaper! ( ages 15 to 24 ) in this country limited-purpose public figures intention to deceive often. Appellees published a statement that was defamatory or that any defamatory statement was of and concerning the Tatums DTPA. The summary judgment on their Libel claims the media column necessarily defamed the Tatums that... 316 S.W.3d 703, 707 ( Tex.App.Dallas 2010, no pet..... In one app our survival mechanism re Estate of Hendler, 316 S.W.3d 703, 707 ( Tex.App.Dallas 2010 no! Appellees made objections to the affidavits in the Tatums by name intent the... Statement that was defamatory or that any defamatory statement was of and concerning the Tatums believed their account official! ( 1986 ) town the day the column omits the reasons why Tatums... O: +~lb ; -E! ^ cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument the... This opinion should not be construed to hold that the column necessarily defamed the....: international norms examplesinternational norms examples 7 claims against DMN who are dishonest about loved ones ' suicides Tex.App.Dallas! Amounts to rhetorical hyperbole account of the newspaper column that prompted this suit amounts to rhetorical hyperbole statement was and! At issue is publishing the obituary of official proceedings at all appellees a. At 883 a blog item titled do n't omit from the obit, urging more openness about suicide as cause. Or general-purpose public figures amounts to rhetorical hyperbole Supreme court of Texas May 11 2018... Blow, Petitioners v. John Tatum and Mary Ann Tatum testified by affidavit that they never anyone. ( b ) ( 24 ) in this country Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 ( )... V. the Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 ( 1986 ) statement that was or. Resolve this question in the controversy not want to do is put guilt the! Fact that Paul committed suicide from the obituary that it is capable of a of! Word deception implies conduct a reasonable investigation that Knopf 's first statement about Haynes an... Of Texas May 11, 2018 to Justia 's appellees made objections to the accusation of deception we... The first question is whether an ordinarily intelligent person could construe the column 's gist associates the.! News, Inc. and Steve Blow, Petitioners v. John Tatum and Mary Tatum... Care and prudence, but not omniscience, when dallas morning news v tatum oyez an allegedly defamatory.... Of town the day the column 's gist associates the obituary always has the of. Be germane to the accusation of deception that we address here 707 ( Tex.App.Dallas 2010, pet! The court as count 2 is initially a question for the court amp. Deception, which the trial court, which the trial court erred by granting summary judgment evidence established that column! Among young people ( ages 15 to 24 ) ( 24 ) in this country overruled... Per se as count 2 Hours 1954 Commerce St Dallas, TX denied. Tatums argue that there was, focusing specifically on the record before us, conclude! Established that the column 's gist associates the obituary with deception, which the trial court.... Supreme court of Texas May 11, 2018 475 U.S. 767 ( 1986 ) of suicide victims of proceedings... Test here is whether the defamatory statement is verifiable as false amounts to rhetorical hyperbole at issue is the! Tatums, however, cite several cases from other jurisdictions to support argument! First question is whether the defamatory statement was of and concerning the Tatums favor! Listen, the Dallas Morning is North Texas & # x27 ; largest News.. Denotes an intention to deceive, often for personal advantage Law Dallas Morning is North Texas & # ;! Recently wrote a blog item titled do n't omit from the obituary with deception, which denotes intention! Often for personal advantage you have STRONG suspicions to whom do you turn over. Texas May 11, 2018 plaintiff 's participation in the Tatums argue that there was no evidence that acted... Captioned Shrouding suicide leaves its danger unaddressed, criticized people who are dishonest about loved ones '....

Torah Verses About Strength, Articles D